For many, the word evokes astronauts, moon landings, and science fiction. It feels distant. Fascinating, even inspiring, but ultimately removed from daily life on the ground. That mental model is now badly out of date.

Space has quietly become critical national infrastructure. Canada’s economic resilience, national security, and sovereign decision-making increasingly depend on systems operating hundreds or thousands of kilometres above our heads.

Canadian military leadership has been clear about the stakes. Brigadier-General Christopher Horner, commander of 3 Canadian Space Division, put it plainly: Access and assured access to space are a requirement of a sovereign, independent nation.”

That is not rhetoric. It is strategic reality.

Every day, Canadians rely on space-enabled services in ways most never notice. Aircraft and ships navigate using satellite signals. Financial transactions depend on precise timing from orbit. Wildfires and extreme weather are monitored from space. Northern and rural communities rely on satellite communications. Even routine conveniences, from digital mapping to app-based deliveries, depend on positioning and connectivity infrastructure that originates in space.

This dependence is already substantial and growing quickly. Defence officials estimate that roughly one-fifth of Canada’s economy is now enabled by space-based systems. In practical terms, space is no longer a niche sector. It is part of the operating system of the modern Canadian economy.

What has shifted most dramatically in recent years is not just our reliance on space, but the environment in which it operates. The domain above us is becoming more crowded, more competitive, and more contested.

Capabilities that once belonged only to major powers are proliferating. Satellites can be jammed, spoofed, cyber-attacked, or physically threatened. Military planners increasingly assume that future crises will begin, not end, in cyber and space. Canadian defence leadership has warned that some foreign counter-space capabilities are “quite alarming” in their potential impact.

For a country like Canada, geography makes this especially consequential. We are vast, sparsely populated, and increasingly focused on an Arctic region that is opening both economically and strategically. Space systems extend our reach across territory that would otherwise be extraordinarily expensive to monitor or service. They underpin NORAD operations, Arctic domain awareness, disaster response, and the command-and-control architecture of modern defence.

If those systems are degraded or denied, Canada does not experience a minor inconvenience. We experience a structural vulnerability.

Canada enters this moment with real strengths. Our space sector has delivered globally respected capabilities in robotics, Earth observation, satellite communications, and space science. Canadian firms and researchers continue to punch above their weight internationally.

But heritage is not a substitute for strategy.

The emerging question is whether Canada will maintain the level of sovereign resilience required in the space domain or gradually slide into deeper dependence on others for critical capabilities. Partnerships will always matter — and Canada benefits enormously from close collaboration with allies — but prudent governments also ensure they retain the core capabilities necessary to act independently when circumstances demand it.

Part of what makes this moment challenging is a persistent communications gap. Public understanding has not kept pace with strategic reality. Too often, conversations about space investment still default to rockets and astronauts, rather than the infrastructure Canadians rely on every day.

That framing matters. Public understanding shapes political mandate. Political mandate shapes investment decisions. And investment decisions will determine whether Canada remains a serious space actor or becomes primarily a customer of other nations’ systems.

We need to start talking about space in plain Canadian terms. Space is not simply about exploration; it is economic infrastructure, Arctic infrastructure, digital infrastructure, and increasingly, security infrastructure. It is part of how food gets delivered efficiently, how aircraft land safely, how wildfires are tracked, how the North stays connected, and how Canada maintains awareness across its vast territory.

The global space economy is accelerating rapidly. The security environment is hardening. The line between civilian and military space capabilities continues to blur. Allies are moving with urgency to strengthen sovereign space resilience and deepen commercial partnerships.

Canada does not need to match the scale of larger powers to remain credible in this domain. But we do need clarity about priorities: resilient communications, trusted positioning and timing, space domain awareness, and reliable access to orbit. Above all, we need to treat space not as an aspirational sector, but as foundational national infrastructure.

Canada still has time to lead in this next phase of the space age, but not time to drift. Because the new frontier is no longer distant. It is already woven into how Canadians live, move, trade, and protect their country every single day.


Jennifer Stewart is the Founder and CEO of Syntax Strategic. She advises senior leaders in energy, defence, security, infrastructure, and emerging industries. Her edge is strategy under pressure: crisis communications, regulatory navigation, reputation defence, and high-stakes positioning. She leads Syntax’s Defence & Security Division to support companies operating at the intersection of sovereignty, procurement, and national interest. 

Submit an opinion: SpaceQ is committed to publishing our community’s perspectives. Whether you’re an academic, executive, engineer or citizen, send your viewpoints to opinion@spaceq.ca to be considered for publication online. Perspectives shared in these op-eds are solely those of the authors.

Leave a comment